By Fabio Bergamin-ETH Zurich
Since the early 1950s, plastics have found their way into almost every area of modern life. Between 1964 and 2014, plastic consumption increased twenty fold, from 15 to 311 million tonnes (around 16.5 to 342.8 million tons) per year.
Not only has environmental pollution from plastic waste increased during this time, but the amount of petroleum its manufacture consumes is large, as are the associated greenhouse gas emissions.
Now, researchers have created a new computational model of global plastic production and disposal that combines three technologies that already exist: plastic recycling and plastic production from biomass and from CO2 through carbon capture and utilization (CCU).
As the calculations showed, the key is to use as much recycled plastic as possible, supplemented by the other two manufacturing methods. These three types of manufacturing correspond to the principle of the circular economy.
By optimally combining the three technologies, the quantity of energy required can be reduced by 34% to 53% compared with the current fossil-based manufacturing practice, supplemented with extensive carbon capture and storage (CCS)—particularly in waste incineration plants, where plastic products are burned at the end of their life cycle.
The cost of the newly proposed manufacturing method is on a par with that of this alternative fossil manufacturing scenario. Under favorable conditions, by 2050 the cost of global plastic production can be reduced by as much as $288 billion per year compared to the alternative scenario.
To achieve this, biomass, CO2, and renewable electricity must be available at low cost, the extraction and supply of petroleum must become more expensive, and incentives must be provided for investment in recycling.
“The lower energy demand may seem counterintuitive, but it results from the amount of energy that recycling saves over the entire life cycle,” says André Bardow, professor of energy and process systems engineering at ETH Zurich.
Policymakers can promote the path to climate-neutral plastics by offering incentives for more plastic recycling and increased use of biomass and CCU, the authors conclude in the study.
“We shouldn’t think of the different technologies for plastic manufacture individually, because there is great potential in combining them in a clever way,” Bardow says.
Additional coauthors of the study, published in the journal Science, are from RWTH Aachen University.
Source: ETH Zurich
—
This post was previously published on futurity.org and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
***
You Might Also Like These From The Good Men Project




Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.
A $50 annual membership gives you an all access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class and community.
A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group and our online communities.
A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.
Register New Account
Log in if you wish to renew an existing subscription.
Username
First Name
Last Name
Password
Password Again
Choose your subscription level
- Yearly - $50.00 - 1 Year
- Monthly - $6.99 - 1 Month
Credit / Debit Card PayPal Choose Your Payment Method
Auto Renew
Subscribe to The Good Men Project Daily Newsletter By completing this registration form, you are also agreeing to our Terms of Service which can be found here.Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.
—
Photo credit: Shutterstock
The post Plastic With Net-zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions Is Possible appeared first on The Good Men Project.
Original Article